Roger Simon looks at this year's extended presidential nomination race between Clinton and Obama and concludes that there is nothing wrong with the process. And if one stands in Buffalo on a cold, windy day, one may conclude that global warming is a myth. This is the fallacy of seizing on a single data point; it is not valid reasoning. --TG
By Roger Simon
Politico
5 May 2008
In past elections, most of the stuff discussed would have been considered "deep in the weeds," but this year there has been an intense concentration on the process itself.
Is our current system of selecting presidential candidates doomed?
It certainly is under attack. And that’s because it has become so messy.
It often starts with a fight over whether Iowa and New Hampshire will go first, and then the rest of the states jostle and elbow each other to move up close behind them.
This year has been downright chaotic. We have two "rogue" states on the Democratic side that have been stripped of all their delegates, and five "semi-rogue" states on the Republican side that have been stripped of half of them. And the Democrats are at an ethical crossroads over whether superdelegates should overturn the choice of pledged delegates.
It has all been very exhausting, which is to say fun. Though I realize not everybody has found it as jolly as I have.
FULL STORY
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment